ST Alpha - "when 'playing it safe' doesn't involves countless billions in waste, unneccessary deaths and the invasion of another country - why not play it safe??? -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 155

In response to "FWIW, I look at global warming the same way I looked at WMDs in Iraq. " by Dano

when 'playing it safe' doesn't involves countless billions in waste, unneccessary deaths and the invasion of another country - why not play it safe??? -- nm

Posted by Guy (aka lostatlimbo) Dec 17 '09, 18:16

(No message)

Responses:

well, it could mean that some measures are unnecessary, which could involve billions in waste. -- nm - Loosi Lou Who Dec 17, 18:17 2
- most of the measures I've read about are neccessary for reasons beyond global warming -- nm - Guy Dec 17, 18:18 1
  - I have no specific argument here, I'm just speculating. -- nm - Loosi Lou Who Dec 17, 18:18

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.