Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 1, 17:33
2: Dec 1, 11:23
3: Nov 30, 15:54
4: Nov 30, 09:41
5: Nov 29, 16:44
6: Nov 29, 08:01
7: Nov 28, 16:19
8: Nov 28, 09:42
9: Nov 27, 18:07
10: Nov 27, 12:04
11: Nov 27, 08:26
12: Nov 26, 18:06
13: Nov 26, 12:05
14: Nov 26, 08:29
15: Nov 25, 18:33
16: Nov 25, 11:12
17: Nov 25, 07:08
18: Nov 24, 13:17
19: Nov 23, 18:13
20: Nov 23, 06:17
Posts: 155
In response to
"
Since 2003, MLB has charged a total of $190M of luxury tax. How much of that was paid by the Yankees?
"
by
TFox
clearly they are not taxing them enough. nm -- nm
Posted by
groiny (aka groiny)
Dec 22 '09, 08:48
(No message)
Responses:
It brings their total 2009 payroll spend to $252M, clearing the rest of the league by a full $100M.
-
TFox
Dec 22, 08:49
8
hence, it is not much of a deterrant to keep some sort of competetive balance. nm -- nm
-
groiny
Dec 22, 08:50
7
I am equally disturbed by the teams pretending to field a professional team at less than $50M of payroll, fwiw. -- nm
-
TFox
Dec 22, 08:52
6
I agree completely.
-
groiny
Dec 22, 08:57
5
I wonder how bad the Marlins lease is given the revenue sharing....
-
Will Hunting
Dec 22, 09:00
[deleted]
2
hey, don't get it twisted. i *love* beating your quarter billion dollar team. love it. -- nm
-
TFox
Dec 22, 09:00
1
[deleted]
Which is why I don't really think there is as big of a salary problem as some. You have one douchebag way up top, and a few at the bottom.
-
TFox
Dec 22, 08:59
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
