Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 2, 11:48
2: Dec 2, 08:21
3: Dec 1, 17:33
4: Dec 1, 11:23
5: Nov 30, 15:54
6: Nov 30, 09:41
7: Nov 29, 16:44
8: Nov 29, 08:01
9: Nov 28, 16:19
10: Nov 28, 09:42
11: Nov 27, 18:07
12: Nov 27, 12:04
13: Nov 27, 08:26
14: Nov 26, 18:06
15: Nov 26, 12:05
16: Nov 26, 08:29
17: Nov 25, 18:33
18: Nov 25, 11:12
19: Nov 25, 07:08
20: Nov 24, 13:17
Posts: 159
Let's make this a hypothetical: What if this man had drowned? -- (link)
Posted by
Beryllium (aka grayman)
Dec 22 '09, 11:10
(No message)
If he had drowned, should his family have the right to sue the marina for failure to secure the area?
(www.cbc.ca)
Responses:
I thought there was some Supreme Court case in the US lately called ithaqa or something like that, where frivolous cases can be dismissed by a judge
-
Loyola
Dec 22, 11:15
3
Lawyer signal!! I thought judges could dismiss frivolous cases already. -- nm
-
Loosi Lou Who
Dec 22, 11:15
2
(speaking without researching but) the court may have decided on a new standard to determine what is frivolous -- nm
-
Roger More
Dec 22, 11:20
I could be misremembering, but I think it relates to frivolous cases. -- nm
-
Loyola
Dec 22, 11:17
He made a mistake. HE is at fault. -- nm
-
CQ
Dec 22, 11:12
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.