ST Alpha - "if you're talking a sequential decade, yes. if you're talking a nominal decade, no. -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 154

In response to "since the first year is 1, not 0, yes. -- nm" by tRuMaN

if you're talking a sequential decade, yes. if you're talking a nominal decade, no. -- nm

Posted by znufrii Dec 28 '09, 13:31

(No message)

Responses:

in other words... - znufrii Dec 28, 13:32 2
- see how you had to re-explain it, because your words do not convey meaning on their own? -- nm - TFox Dec 28, 13:34 1
  - I just wanted to make sure you could understand what I was saying, that's all. - znufrii Dec 28, 13:37

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.