Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Nov 30, 15:54
2: Nov 30, 09:41
3: Nov 29, 16:44
4: Nov 29, 08:01
5: Nov 28, 16:19
6: Nov 28, 09:42
7: Nov 27, 18:07
8: Nov 27, 12:04
9: Nov 27, 08:26
10: Nov 26, 18:06
11: Nov 26, 12:05
12: Nov 26, 08:29
13: Nov 25, 18:33
14: Nov 25, 11:12
15: Nov 25, 07:08
16: Nov 24, 13:17
17: Nov 23, 18:13
18: Nov 23, 06:17
19: Nov 22, 13:24
20: Nov 22, 09:09
Posts: 155
In response to
"
No one disputes that he could sit there mum and that's that. But do you really believe that a military interrogater wouldn't have a better chance....
"
by
Name Withheld By Request
such as...? -- nm
Posted by
Reagen (aka Reagen)
Dec 31 '09, 10:23
(No message)
Responses:
Here's the list on Wiki as pulled from the field manual: -- (link)
-
Name Withheld By Request
Dec 31, 10:37
2
other than the last two, I can't see why any of those couldn't be used in normal interrogation.
-
Reagen
Dec 31, 10:40
1
1
At least half the list is rendered ineffective with a lawyer present. At least half. -- nm
-
Name Withheld By Request
Dec 31, 10:43
well, there's the hot-coat-hanger-to-the-testes... i think that one's still legal. -- nm
-
TFox
Dec 31, 10:24
3
Interrogating someone in the middle of the night just 'cause. I can't imagine the FBI can do that regularly. -- nm
-
Name Withheld By Request
Dec 31, 10:31
2
Why not? FBI agents only work 8-5?
-
Will Hunting
Dec 31, 10:34
1
I'm thinking the lawyer present aspect probably has rules to prevent "abuse" by the legal agency. Could be wrong.
-
Name Withheld By Request
Dec 31, 10:35
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
