ST Alpha - "playing for 16-0 guarantees the loss of Reggie Wayne? -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 158

In response to "I just don't get what good 16-0 would be if the Colts lost, say...Reggie Wayne...getting there. -- nm" by Jim

playing for 16-0 guarantees the loss of Reggie Wayne? -- nm

Posted by TFox Jan 4 '10, 12:37

(No message)

Responses:

That's not what I said. You missed the "if" in my post. Again...what good is the undefeated regular season if you potentially jeopardize the - Jim Jan 4, 12:39 10
- well, if it didn't have a little jeopardy involved in it, then it wouldn't be worth getting, would it? - TFox Jan 4, 12:40 9
  - And this is where we differ, I guess. I play to win the Super Bowl. I don't care what my record is, as long as I win the last game of the season. -- nm - Jim Jan 4, 12:42 8
    - Because you are sort of scared of having an A+ season, and would rather say "Deal" with Howie Mandel and just take the B+ season. - TFox Jan 4, 12:44 4
      - So you'd rather have 18-1 with your loss in the Super Bowl...than 18-1 with your loss in Week 17? -- nm - Jim Jan 4, 12:46 3
        
        unequivocally yes, if the loss in Week 17 is us laying down and forfeiting. -- nm - TFox Jan 4, 12:46 2
        
        You so funny. -- nm - Spawn: Champion of ST Jan 4, 12:47 1
        
        I'm not lying. -- nm - TFox Jan 4, 12:47
    - Problem is there's more evidence that if you rest key players, you probably won't make it to the Super Bowl. -- nm - Inigo Jan 4, 12:44
    - [deleted] 1
      - FWIW, I wouldn't have pulled Manning either. I just don't understand the grief this dude has taken. - Jim Jan 4, 12:45
(playing for 16-0 even makes the loss of Reggie Wayne probable?) -- nm - TFox Jan 4, 12:37

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.