Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 1, 17:33
2: Dec 1, 11:23
3: Nov 30, 15:54
4: Nov 30, 09:41
5: Nov 29, 16:44
6: Nov 29, 08:01
7: Nov 28, 16:19
8: Nov 28, 09:42
9: Nov 27, 18:07
10: Nov 27, 12:04
11: Nov 27, 08:26
12: Nov 26, 18:06
13: Nov 26, 12:05
14: Nov 26, 08:29
15: Nov 25, 18:33
16: Nov 25, 11:12
17: Nov 25, 07:08
18: Nov 24, 13:17
19: Nov 23, 18:13
20: Nov 23, 06:17
Posts: 158
In response to
"
Because it's hypocrisy.
"
by
musubi
Well, with this admission, he won't get in becuase of his play. -- nm
Posted by
Will Hunting (aka JoeMetz)
Jan 11 '10, 13:17
(No message)
Responses:
yep.
-
b.
Jan 11, 13:22
7
I don't even think McGwire was that good before.
-
Will Hunting
Jan 11, 13:23
6
You are just wrong there. (nm)
-
musubi
Jan 11, 13:28
maybe not tippy top; but, iirc, he went to the all-star games early on and got some mvp votes.-- nm
-
b.
Jan 11, 13:27
4
Becuase he was a long ball hitter. That doesn't make him good hitting .230
-
Will Hunting
Jan 11, 13:29
2
looking at his numbers overall... he was good enough. nm but: -- (link)
-
b.
Jan 11, 13:34
You're tying his worth to his batting average, when clearly on-base is the more important stat?
-
musubi
Jan 11, 13:32
.235 with 49 homers and 100 walks was a fine season in 1989. nm -- nm
-
groiny
Jan 11, 13:28
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
