Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 1, 17:33
2: Dec 1, 11:23
3: Nov 30, 15:54
4: Nov 30, 09:41
5: Nov 29, 16:44
6: Nov 29, 08:01
7: Nov 28, 16:19
8: Nov 28, 09:42
9: Nov 27, 18:07
10: Nov 27, 12:04
11: Nov 27, 08:26
12: Nov 26, 18:06
13: Nov 26, 12:05
14: Nov 26, 08:29
15: Nov 25, 18:33
16: Nov 25, 11:12
17: Nov 25, 07:08
18: Nov 24, 13:17
19: Nov 23, 18:13
20: Nov 23, 06:17
Posts: 159
Fedup-inspired Poll: So when does the rebound cycle end? When is one relationship not just a rebound for another? -- nm
Posted by
Hotkiss (aka hotkiss7348)
Jan 12 '10, 13:02
(No message)
Responses:
doesn't matter because you'll never recognise any of them properly at the time -- nm
-
zork
Jan 12, 13:18
i think the bigger question is: Can a rebound relationship ever become THE ONE? or is there innately something missing from the get-go? -- nm
-
fedup
Jan 12, 13:15
14
Of course. There is no offical "Rebound" stamp on a relationship.
-
Spawn: Champion of ST
Jan 12, 13:23
1
ahem
-
groiny
Jan 12, 13:24
You guys realize rebounds aren't just "relationships that start after other relationships", right?
-
TFox
Jan 12, 13:20
3
i think that my question does indicate some modicum of understanding of "rebound"... -- nm
-
fedup
Jan 12, 13:24
2
if it's like Andie says, "a relationship you start when you're not over your ex"...then does that mean it's fated to never work. something missing? -- nm
-
fedup
Jan 12, 13:26
1
maybe its "relationship" then? there's definitely some words in here that aren't being understood correctly. -- nm
-
TFox
Jan 12, 13:26
I think the impetus for a lot of relationships which are characterized as "rebounds" comes from the idea that while the per rebounding might no longer
-
znufrii
Jan 12, 13:18
7
and while it's not impossible for that dynamic to reverse itself over time, it's far from the ideal situation for beginning a new relationship. -- nm
-
znufrii
Jan 12, 13:19
6
[deleted]
5
because I was done with the old one and was ready to move on. everything else was details.
-
znufrii
Jan 12, 13:23
4
[deleted]
3
indeed. -- nm
-
znufrii
Jan 12, 13:25
be nice to znu today -- nm
-
Hotkiss
Jan 12, 13:24
1
why start now? -- nm
-
zork
Jan 12, 13:26
On the first sunday following the third full moon -- nm
-
Guigue
Jan 12, 13:09
it ends when you stay with someone. -- nm
-
loosilu
Jan 12, 13:07
Instantly. "Rebound" is just a BS term made up for sitcoms.
-
musubi
Jan 12, 13:05
36
i define a rebound as a 'relationship' you start when you aren't over your ex. -- nm
-
Andie
Jan 12, 13:07
35
And when is someone "over" their ex? When they're ready to get in a new relationship.
-
musubi
Jan 12, 13:10
4
As I said, never. We leave traces of ourselves behind (not just the groiny type).
-
Spawn: Champion of ST
Jan 12, 13:17
i've seen it in real life, it's a tactic people use to distract them from a painful breakup.
-
Andie
Jan 12, 13:12
2
I'm not explaining myself well. I'm not saying it doesn't happen. I'm saying they're self-defined.
-
musubi
Jan 12, 13:14
1
ah. -- nm
-
Andie
Jan 12, 13:15
Right. I've never been in a rebound relationship, for example. nm
-
Dignan
Jan 12, 13:09
27
(And I always *hate* it when people say "go sleep around!" as a means of forgetting a painful breakup.) nm
-
Dignan
Jan 12, 13:11
26
me too. i've never had the mental energy to have a relationship while mourning the last one. -- nm
-
Andie
Jan 12, 13:12
25
I see a rebound as a instant gratification way to get some self-esteem back. Not saying that's wise, though. -- nm
-
con_carne
Jan 12, 13:24
2
But it's empty, and therefore counter-intuitive to this end. nm
-
Dignan
Jan 12, 13:26
1
People do stupid shit when they are in the emotional depths (not saying that describes HK, either) -- nm
-
con_carne
Jan 12, 13:27
I don't think it's about finding another relationship...
-
Mel Profit
Jan 12, 13:23
7
Right. Which is what I mean by "unfair to both parties." nm
-
Dignan
Jan 12, 13:25
1
That's what I said! Dignan and I agree....? -- nm
-
Hotkiss
Jan 12, 13:26
Hi!
-
Hotkiss
Jan 12, 13:24
4
I'm back now. I'm too lazy to work that hard for extended periods. -- nm
-
Mel Profit
Jan 12, 13:27
uh oh, Mel....
-
groiny
Jan 12, 13:25
2
*winks at groiny* -- nm
-
Hotkiss
Jan 12, 13:25
1
*unzips*
-
groiny
Jan 12, 13:26
I have found this to be true. -- nm
-
Hotkiss
Jan 12, 13:22
I am usually just thrilled to be free from obligations.
-
groiny
Jan 12, 13:14
8
Then it isn't a painful breakup. nm
-
Dignan
Jan 12, 13:15
7
define painful? nm -- nm
-
groiny
Jan 12, 13:15
6
The opposite of "thrilled." nm
-
Dignan
Jan 12, 13:16
5
so if you are the dumper, not the dumpee, you can not have a rebound? nm -- nm
-
groiny
Jan 12, 13:17
4
(and, yes, a dumper can absolutely have a rebound. I'm talking about your statement specifically.) nm
-
Dignan
Jan 12, 13:21
If you are thrilled to be free, and felt that your relationship was an "obligation," then your next relationship isn't a rebound. nm
-
Dignan
Jan 12, 13:19
1
I find freedom to be much easier than being in a relationship.
-
groiny
Jan 12, 13:21
[deleted]
It's so juvenile. And unfair to both parties. nm
-
Dignan
Jan 12, 13:13
2
who are you??? nm -- nm
-
groiny
Jan 12, 13:14
1
*laughing*
-
Andie
Jan 12, 13:16
me. three. -- nm
-
loosilu
Jan 12, 13:13
start when, or end because -- nm
-
Max
Jan 12, 13:08
I think this is exactly right. -- nm
-
pmb
Jan 12, 13:08
It's all different, but easiest way...when you don't feel you need to be in a relationship. -- nm
-
Will Hunting
Jan 12, 13:05
8
I completely disagree.
-
Spawn: Champion of ST
Jan 12, 13:07
3
I think you got it backwards....if you just end a relationship and suddenly you have a missing component in your life
-
Will Hunting
Jan 12, 13:10
2
Ah. I see the differenve. *My* natural state is to be alone. My "rebound" is my reset while being alone. I admit, there were times I (TMI)
-
Spawn: Champion of ST
Jan 12, 13:16
Ridiculously, I think you're both right. -- nm
-
Roger More
Jan 12, 13:11
No man is an island. Everyone needs relationshiops. -- nm
-
TFox
Jan 12, 13:06
2
When you don't feel you need to be in a relationship just for the sake of being in a relationship. -- nm
-
Loyola
Jan 12, 13:08
"brought to you by Bon Jovi" -- nm
-
Hotkiss
Jan 12, 13:07
Yeah, this. -- nm
-
Loyola
Jan 12, 13:06
It's different for *every single relationship.* nm
-
Dignan
Jan 12, 13:04
4
Why are you being difficult, Dignan? Just tell her the secret! -- nm
-
Reagen
Jan 12, 13:07
There has to be a simple mathematical expression for it! Something like 1/2 plus 7. (nm)
-
musubi
Jan 12, 13:06
2
maybe we can modify "win shares" to something like "rebound shares".... -- nm
-
TFox
Jan 12, 13:13
1
Bill James just came out with "Loss Shares", that's something! (nm)
-
musubi
Jan 12, 13:15
Technically?
-
Spawn: Champion of ST
Jan 12, 13:03
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.