ST Alpha - "It 100% lost me with the chick chained in the basement for "humor"." (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 157

In response to "Ok, so that TPM review/analysis *was* scathingly accurate. I could have done without the "comedy" bits interspersed, which were distracting" by musubi

It 100% lost me with the chick chained in the basement for "humor".

Posted by TFox Jan 13 '10, 09:53

But I wasn't all that impressed before that either.

Responses:

I choose to ignore those bits. Just like I ignore most of TPM to enjoy it. - musubi Jan 13, 09:57 26
- Can you spoil me on my favorite glaring plot hole if thet guy mentions it? - Will Hunting Jan 13, 10:09 3
  - he doesn't mention it. On a scale of things to mention, that's so minor ... :) -- nm - Beryllium Jan 13, 10:10 2
    - Yeah, he doesn't really address questionable physics...except one that I didn't notice till it was mentioned last night. (spoils) - musubi Jan 13, 10:20 1
      - Yeah, that was a weird one -- nm - Beryllium Jan 13, 10:21
- Also: To be fair, probably 90% of movies couldn't stand up to the level of scrutiny that's invested into picking apart TPM. - musubi Jan 13, 10:00 20
  - I agree with that. I just realized I was about to become a guy who spent over an hour watching a Youtube video by a guy I actually wanted to hit. - TFox Jan 13, 10:06
  - Part 1 defines the basic problems with it, and they are major. The rest does involve a lot of nit-picking. -- nm - Dano Jan 13, 10:05
  - I disagree with that 90% number. All the guy did was MST3000 the plot, characters and dialogue. - Inigo Jan 13, 10:05 11
    - See my reply to Bery. (nm) - musubi Jan 13, 10:10 8
      - Could you nitpick 90% of movies to a much lesser degree? Sure. Could you completely tear apart 90% of movies the same way? No. -- nm - Inigo Jan 13, 10:13 7
        
        Yeah. Pretty much. I didn't say 90% were as bad, just that 90% can't stand that level of scrutiny. (nm) - musubi Jan 13, 10:22 1
        
        Ahhh. We agree. -- nm - Inigo Jan 13, 10:23
        
        He didn't completely tear it apart. If you took that to be an unbiased and evenhanded dismantling, I don't know what to tell you. -- nm - TFox Jan 13, 10:15 4
        
        [deleted]
        
        except if did it unfairly, people would be pointing at the things he's taking apart and saying "Wait, he did that because..." - Reagen Jan 13, 10:23
        
        You're right - in reality, he looked at it the wrong way, and *it fucking fell apart on its own* ;-) -- nm - Beryllium Jan 13, 10:21
        
        He did thrash it, but I never said it was unbiased or even handed. He clearly thought the movie sucked. -- nm - Inigo Jan 13, 10:18
    - well towards the end he does get into stuff Lucas put in that shows he doesn't understand why Star Wars became popular. - Reagen Jan 13, 10:07 1
      - The one that cuts deepest imo was when he showed (spoils) - musubi Jan 13, 10:24
  - I think you're wrong, since at least 60% of movies have simple stories with a clear protagonist and arc. ;-) -- nm - Beryllium Jan 13, 10:00 4
    - I'm not saying TPM is better than 90%, mind you, just that 90% of movies can't stand the kind of scrutiny that TPM is held to. (nm) - musubi Jan 13, 10:06 1
      - ah, I see. Yeah, I can agree with that. -- nm - Beryllium Jan 13, 10:07
    - (I'm not sure if I can include porn in that stat. Who is the protagonist in a porno?) -- nm - Beryllium Jan 13, 10:01 1
      - depends on who's watching it. -- nm - Reagen Jan 13, 10:04
  - this was my take on it too -- nm - fatsquatch Jan 13, 10:00
- A Humvee driving through the middle of a shot in TPM would be a smaller plot hole than some of the existing ones. :) -- nm - Beryllium Jan 13, 09:59

Post a message top

It 100% lost me with the chick chained in the basement for "humor".

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.