Backboards: 
Posts: 157

ok, work ethical dilemma (sp?) - interested to hear what people think [especially certain people here]

mary is a decidedly subpar employee.
quality of work is bad, her attitude is worse.
everyone who has any level of contact with her would agree that her being employed hurts the institution. it would be better off for all involved if she no longer worked here.

you learn through roundabout yet entirely credible means that mary will be fired by the end of the year if she does not produce a certain thing. let's say it's a certain report. her pending termination doesn't really coincide directly with her attitude/poor quality of work - it's tied more directly to the question of her being able to produce the report. you realize that at present there's no way that she can produce said report. it's not a question of her refusing to do it, but rather she does not have the tools/knowledge to produce the report. she's unaware that she's in the middle of this no-win situation.

at the same time you hear this, you realize that you are able to supply mary the means to produce the report. no one has asked you do to this, so whether or not you help her is entirely up to you. people will realize that you enabled her to produce the report, yet if you do nothing, no one will be the wiser.

do you help her, thereby saving her job, and yet burdening the rest of the instituion with her continued existance here, or do nothing and let events leading to her eventual termination run their course?


Responses:
Post a message   top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.