Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 2, 11:48
2: Dec 2, 08:21
3: Dec 1, 17:33
4: Dec 1, 11:23
5: Nov 30, 15:54
6: Nov 30, 09:41
7: Nov 29, 16:44
8: Nov 29, 08:01
9: Nov 28, 16:19
10: Nov 28, 09:42
11: Nov 27, 18:07
12: Nov 27, 12:04
13: Nov 27, 08:26
14: Nov 26, 18:06
15: Nov 26, 12:05
16: Nov 26, 08:29
17: Nov 25, 18:33
18: Nov 25, 11:12
19: Nov 25, 07:08
20: Nov 24, 13:17
Posts: 157
Did I miss something? What are you talking about?
Posted by
krusty (aka Krustylu)
Nov 19 '08, 12:30
A one game playoff doesn't decide which is the better team, which is what I assumed the playoffs were for.
Responses:
[deleted]
12
Then the owner of the A's is retarded.
-
krusty
Nov 19, 12:38
11
Right it OUGHT to be a 3 game series. -- nm
-
Ender
Nov 19, 12:49
1
5 minimum, imo. -- nm
-
krusty
Nov 19, 12:53
[deleted]
8
Equally retarded, IMO. -- nm
-
TFox
Nov 19, 12:41
3
[deleted]
2
Why should team be rewarded by going to the playoffs if they weren't good enough to win their division?
-
krusty
Nov 19, 12:46
Cons: it would necessitate shortening the season, and we already let the top 25% of teams in after 162 games of play.
-
TFox
Nov 19, 12:46
[deleted]
3
That doesn't work either. We already have too many teams and rounds in the playoffs.
-
krusty
Nov 19, 12:42
2
Also, I'd get rid of about 4-6 teams if not more. -- nm
-
krusty
Nov 19, 12:43
1
I'd be more interested in introducing relegation.
-
znufrii
Nov 19, 13:00
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.