Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 4, 12:27
2: Dec 4, 09:36
3: Dec 4, 02:38
4: Dec 3, 14:19
5: Dec 3, 11:17
6: Dec 3, 07:33
7: Dec 2, 17:22
8: Dec 2, 11:48
9: Dec 2, 08:21
10: Dec 1, 17:33
11: Dec 1, 11:23
12: Nov 30, 15:54
13: Nov 30, 09:41
14: Nov 29, 16:44
15: Nov 29, 08:01
16: Nov 28, 16:19
17: Nov 28, 09:42
18: Nov 27, 18:07
19: Nov 27, 12:04
20: Nov 27, 08:26
Posts: 162
In response to
"
Exactly. In the context of the last two weeks and with Letterman's recent history, how is that not a good shiv? -- nm
"
by
Name Withheld By Request
I believe that if any of the other guys said it, no one would be saying boo. -- nm
Posted by
Name Withheld By Request (aka BlueKopo)
Jan 21 '10, 09:26
(No message)
Responses:
Because either of them would have made it *funny*. -- nm
-
Spawn: Champion of ST
Jan 21, 09:27
5
So say that it was unfunny, not that he overreacted (shotgun per you B2 post).
-
musubi
Jan 21, 09:31
3
The IM was the key to my message. -- nm
-
Spawn: Champion of ST
Jan 21, 09:35
it can be both -- nm
-
i'm gay for batman
Jan 21, 09:33
1
So make a cogent arguement for it being over the line. So far the only rational arguement has been it's unfunny.
-
musubi
Jan 21, 09:36
Word for word. Yet it would be a different reaction. Hell, it's funnier than some of the lines Kimmel did last week that got him tons of praise. -- nm
-
Name Withheld By Request
Jan 21, 09:30
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
