Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Nov 29, 16:44
2: Nov 29, 08:01
3: Nov 28, 16:19
4: Nov 28, 09:42
5: Nov 27, 18:07
6: Nov 27, 12:04
7: Nov 27, 08:26
8: Nov 26, 18:06
9: Nov 26, 12:05
10: Nov 26, 08:29
11: Nov 25, 18:33
12: Nov 25, 11:12
13: Nov 25, 07:08
14: Nov 24, 13:17
15: Nov 23, 18:13
16: Nov 23, 06:17
17: Nov 22, 13:24
18: Nov 22, 09:09
19: Nov 21, 22:36
20: Nov 21, 14:03
Posts: 152
they can buy all the ads they want. is anyone going to see them and suddenly think "wow, Wall Street *is* a great thing. don't tax those great banks
Posted by
i'm gay for batman (aka chris)
Jan 21 '10, 12:10
Obama"
Responses:
[deleted]
9
so fine. their opponent can run ads calling the candidate out for being a Wall Street shill and the voters can decide -- nm
-
i'm gay for batman
Jan 21, 12:14
7
[deleted]
6
newsflash: both parties are already bought and paid for by corporations. -- nm
-
i'm gay for batman
Jan 21, 12:32
2
[deleted]
1
seriously, he sounds like me on a bad day... -- nm
-
znufrii
Jan 21, 12:43
there is a finite number of ads/time in the day that any candidate can buy. at some point, buying too many is going to have the opposite effect of
-
i'm gay for batman
Jan 21, 12:18
2
Has media saturation ever worked that way?
-
musubi
Jan 21, 12:20
[deleted]
what makes you think political reporters will bother checking into it either? -- nm
-
znufrii
Jan 21, 12:14
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
