Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Nov 29, 16:44
2: Nov 29, 08:01
3: Nov 28, 16:19
4: Nov 28, 09:42
5: Nov 27, 18:07
6: Nov 27, 12:04
7: Nov 27, 08:26
8: Nov 26, 18:06
9: Nov 26, 12:05
10: Nov 26, 08:29
11: Nov 25, 18:33
12: Nov 25, 11:12
13: Nov 25, 07:08
14: Nov 24, 13:17
15: Nov 23, 18:13
16: Nov 23, 06:17
17: Nov 22, 13:24
18: Nov 22, 09:09
19: Nov 21, 22:36
20: Nov 21, 14:03
Posts: 152
Could you explain what the reasoning the majority uses for treating corporations as individuals? (nm)
Posted by
musubi
Jan 21 '10, 12:15
As a layman, I don't understand it at all.
Responses:
[deleted]
1
individual freedom is overrated
-
Danedukenuuk
Jan 21, 12:20
i haven't read the opinion but the whole legal fiction underlying a business entity is that it is a "person" capable of acting in legal capacities -- nm
-
i'm gay for batman
Jan 21, 12:17
7
That much I get. The legal arguement of how they are equivalent is what puzzles me.
-
musubi
Jan 21, 12:18
6
[deleted]
equal protection says you have to apply all laws equally to all people -- nm
-
i'm gay for batman
Jan 21, 12:20
1
[deleted]
[deleted]
2
This is what I was looking for, thank you.
-
musubi
Jan 21, 12:21
[deleted]
in Canada corporations are formed to limit a person's liability, seems like just another step... -- nm
-
Beaker
Jan 21, 12:16
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
