Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Nov 29, 08:01
2: Nov 28, 16:19
3: Nov 28, 09:42
4: Nov 27, 18:07
5: Nov 27, 12:04
6: Nov 27, 08:26
7: Nov 26, 18:06
8: Nov 26, 12:05
9: Nov 26, 08:29
10: Nov 25, 18:33
11: Nov 25, 11:12
12: Nov 25, 07:08
13: Nov 24, 13:17
14: Nov 23, 18:13
15: Nov 23, 06:17
16: Nov 22, 13:24
17: Nov 22, 09:09
18: Nov 21, 22:36
19: Nov 21, 14:03
20: Nov 21, 10:18
Posts: 158
it could be worse - they could have ruled that corporations can run for political office
Posted by
Guy (aka lostatlimbo)
Jan 21 '10, 12:44
or is that next on the docket?
Responses:
Two businesses could marry to reduce their tax burden. -- nm
-
Loyola
Jan 21, 12:48
2
Ban Same Stock Marriages!! -- nm
-
Prop 8
Jan 21, 12:49
1
might as well marry comcast cause they keep screwing me -- nm
-
z-droid
Jan 21, 13:14
[deleted]
6
but they could run for other offices with less years, right? -- nm
-
zork
Jan 21, 12:52
Eat it Toyota!!! -- nm
-
President Ford Motors
Jan 21, 12:49
3
Toyota would actually be eligible (sort of) in 2012 ... -- nm
-
Beryllium
Jan 21, 12:57
1
(I don't know what the corporate equivalent of "birthers" would be, though) -- nm
-
Beryllium
Jan 21, 12:58
1926 was a great year 1937 even better -- nm
-
Danedukenuuk
Jan 21, 12:53
Fuck yeah!! -- nm
-
President IBM
Jan 21, 12:46
"President Google" -- nm
-
Beryllium
Jan 21, 12:44
Microsoft for President! -- nm
-
Beaker
Jan 21, 12:44
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
