Backboards: 
Posts: 153
In response to "yeah, it's a wildly unfortunate name. what else could it have been, though? iTab? iSlate? IPaper? -- nm" by amanda

I thought they were going to come up with something non-related like "iPod"

seems logical when you're trying to sell that you're creating a new category of device.

I think they should have gone that way. iPhone worked there because they were entering an existing market.

What they've done with the bad name here is make it a certainty that people continue to call these devices tablets.


Responses:
Post a message   top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.