In response to
"yeah, it's a wildly unfortunate name. what else could it have been, though? iTab? iSlate? IPaper? -- nm"
by
amanda
|
I thought they were going to come up with something non-related like "iPod"
Posted by
stewie (aka whysoserious)
Jan 27 '10, 17:39
|
seems logical when you're trying to sell that you're creating a new category of device.
I think they should have gone that way. iPhone worked there because they were entering an existing market.
What they've done with the bad name here is make it a certainty that people continue to call these devices tablets.
|
Responses:
|