Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Nov 29, 16:44
2: Nov 29, 08:01
3: Nov 28, 16:19
4: Nov 28, 09:42
5: Nov 27, 18:07
6: Nov 27, 12:04
7: Nov 27, 08:26
8: Nov 26, 18:06
9: Nov 26, 12:05
10: Nov 26, 08:29
11: Nov 25, 18:33
12: Nov 25, 11:12
13: Nov 25, 07:08
14: Nov 24, 13:17
15: Nov 23, 18:13
16: Nov 23, 06:17
17: Nov 22, 13:24
18: Nov 22, 09:09
19: Nov 21, 22:36
20: Nov 21, 14:03
Posts: 165
In response to
"
right. "disclosure", without disclosure. "i'm not doing anything wrong. i'm wearing my wedding ring, for pete's sake." -- nm
"
by
TFox
it can be slightly sketchy, but not as horrible as its being presented in the article I think.
Posted by
znufrii
Jan 28 '10, 07:43
I think the single ladies in the article are overreacting a bit.
Responses:
Again, in the article, the "calling me just to say hi" is what kicked it off. and i don't think that is an overreaction. -- nm
-
TFox
Jan 28, 07:53
3
In that specific instance, yes.
-
znufrii
Jan 28, 08:00
1
they are defining "friends" as friends, not casual acquaintances. and in that instance almost always, it's douchy behavior. that's the point. -- nm
-
TFox
Jan 28, 08:04
oh boy would I be in trouble. nm -- nm
-
groiny
Jan 28, 07:56
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.