Backboards: 
Posts: 153

"Why insensitive bosses make more sense"

"According to Moulton, the great thing about being insensitive is that it �lets you sleep when others can�t�. I seized on this remark and put it together with something that Lord Browne had said to me the previous week, when he�d let slip that, in 40 years at BP, he hadn�t lost one night�s sleep because of work. If you are the sort of person who loses sleep, you can�t be a CEO, he said.

By combining Moulton and Browne, I get this syllogism. CEOs must sleep. Insensitivity is vital for sleep. Therefore, CEOs should be insensitive.

Hand in hand with insensitivity goes denial. If you aren�t born insensitive you can acquire it by learning how to deny pesky feelings that get in the way. In fact, confidence comes as a result of denying the likelihood of failure.

Denial comes in handy not just for people destined for the top but for all workers. It is necessary to be in a state of mild denial before you get to work in the morning. True thoughts such as �this is pointless� or �it doesn�t matter if I do this or not�, must be resolutely ignored.

I�m not arguing that emotional intelligence is altogether a bad thing. It is lovely in a friend, and may arguably be good in a spouse. In a boss what is needed is not to be out-and-out emotionally stupid, but mildly emotionally dyslexic."


Post a message   top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.