Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 1, 17:33
2: Dec 1, 11:23
3: Nov 30, 15:54
4: Nov 30, 09:41
5: Nov 29, 16:44
6: Nov 29, 08:01
7: Nov 28, 16:19
8: Nov 28, 09:42
9: Nov 27, 18:07
10: Nov 27, 12:04
11: Nov 27, 08:26
12: Nov 26, 18:06
13: Nov 26, 12:05
14: Nov 26, 08:29
15: Nov 25, 18:33
16: Nov 25, 11:12
17: Nov 25, 07:08
18: Nov 24, 13:17
19: Nov 23, 18:13
20: Nov 23, 06:17
Posts: 156
In response to
"
She was snarky, as I would be after the experience she had.
"
by
Subversive
Snarky is fine, but it doesn't usually get you what you want. You don't read a letter like hers and automatically think "we'd better fix things"
Posted by
Roger More (aka RogerMore)
Feb 26 '10, 12:35
Of course, no amount of snark in her complaint would have deserved the reply it got.
Responses:
This is my point. She probably should have expected somewhat of a snarky response, given the tone of her e-mail.
-
Subversive
Feb 26, 12:37
Take out the two sentences that contained the F-Bombs, and he probably gets by going snark for snark. But, once he went there... -- nm
-
flavorize
Feb 26, 12:37
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.