Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 1, 17:33
2: Dec 1, 11:23
3: Nov 30, 15:54
4: Nov 30, 09:41
5: Nov 29, 16:44
6: Nov 29, 08:01
7: Nov 28, 16:19
8: Nov 28, 09:42
9: Nov 27, 18:07
10: Nov 27, 12:04
11: Nov 27, 08:26
12: Nov 26, 18:06
13: Nov 26, 12:05
14: Nov 26, 08:29
15: Nov 25, 18:33
16: Nov 25, 11:12
17: Nov 25, 07:08
18: Nov 24, 13:17
19: Nov 23, 18:13
20: Nov 23, 06:17
Posts: 158
In response to
"
No, groiny is good that way.
"
by
Subversive
I just don't follow how you could enter a draft with over $200 to fill like 13 spots, and not just decide to get the two best players available.
Posted by
TFox
Mar 3 '10, 09:00
Or, I could see someone doing it, but not understand why it would be wise.
Responses:
It seems like you're saying two different things. Can you clarify?
-
Subversive
Mar 3, 09:04
1
What I'm suggesting is that if Pujols goes for around $40, your league is doing it wrong.
-
TFox
Mar 3, 09:09
I put a high value on position scarcity.
-
groiny
Mar 3, 09:01
2
I'm impressed if you see success with that. I have rarely seen that work.
-
TFox
Mar 3, 09:04
1
also depends on the # of teams....
-
groiny
Mar 3, 09:06
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.