ST Alpha - "Is Syracuse a #1 seed? -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 157

Is Syracuse a #1 seed? -- nm

Posted by Dano (aka dano) Mar 11 '10, 11:19

(No message)

Responses:

I think Duke is shakier in this regard than Syracuse. -- nm - David Mar 11, 11:28 1
- Duke sucks -- nm - Beaker Mar 11, 11:35
about 1000 BC it was -- nm - Danedukenuuk Mar 11, 11:28
yes -- nm - Beaker Mar 11, 11:27
Mountaineers, baby! -- nm - 16 & pixie Mar 11, 11:26 4
- I was thinking it also puts Purdue in the conversation. Syracuse might still get it but now I think there are two #1 seeds in question instead of one -- nm - Dano Mar 11, 11:28 3
  - I'd say Duke gets the #1 before Purdue. -- nm - Krusty Mar 11, 11:36
  - Pains me to say it, but Purdue is. -- nm - Spawn Mar 11, 11:29 1
    - I wouldn't rush to put them there unless they win the Big Ten tourney. Injuries do get taken into account - Will Hunting Mar 11, 11:33
I still say yes. -- nm - Krusty Mar 11, 11:22
health is more concerning than the loss -- nm - G.waa Mar 11, 11:20

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.