ST Alpha - "SyrDragon from b2: I thought choking hazards were the opposite? 3 and under, not 3 and over. Anyway, google shows that there are loads and loads" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 161

SyrDragon from b2: I thought choking hazards were the opposite? 3 and under, not 3 and over. Anyway, google shows that there are loads and loads

Posted by loosilu (aka loosilu2) Apr 6 '10, 10:41

of discussions about putting buttons on baby clothes. Sewing on snaps is not any better than sewing on buttons. (on commercial clothes the snaps are sewn inside the material, or fused on, which I can't do). I don't want to do a zipper because it's really hard to sew on.

maybe I will do little ties or something.

Responses:

that's what I was saying...sorry if I wasn't clear. The warnings say toys are FOR age3+ so poses chocking haz for 3&under -- nm - SyrDragon Apr 6, 10:53 2
- right, so no buttons. I'll come up with something. -- nm - loosilu Apr 6, 10:54 1
  - yeah the ties or ribbons with pom poms will be fine...as long as it is not too long -- nm - SyrDragon Apr 6, 10:59
maybe you can just rivet the clothes onto the baby -- nm - Beryllium Apr 6, 10:42

Post a message top

SyrDragon from b2: I thought choking hazards were the opposite? 3 and under, not 3 and over. Anyway, google shows that there are loads and loads

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.