Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 1, 17:33
2: Dec 1, 11:23
3: Nov 30, 15:54
4: Nov 30, 09:41
5: Nov 29, 16:44
6: Nov 29, 08:01
7: Nov 28, 16:19
8: Nov 28, 09:42
9: Nov 27, 18:07
10: Nov 27, 12:04
11: Nov 27, 08:26
12: Nov 26, 18:06
13: Nov 26, 12:05
14: Nov 26, 08:29
15: Nov 25, 18:33
16: Nov 25, 11:12
17: Nov 25, 07:08
18: Nov 24, 13:17
19: Nov 23, 18:13
20: Nov 23, 06:17
Posts: 158
yes - it's pretty much the definition of a chilling effect. -- nm
Posted by
Reagen (aka Reagen)
May 7 '10, 10:45
(No message)
Responses:
I don't have a tremendous problem with that on the surface. Especially in political reporting, the use of unnamed sources has been abused to no end.
-
Name Withheld By Request
May 7, 10:48
4
I wonder if Adscam or Shawinigate would have been as big without unnamed sources. :) -- nm
-
Reagen
May 7, 10:51
3
Well, the latter is what prompted this particular case. An unnamed source turned over a letter tying in Chretien and RCMP determined it was a forgery
-
Name Withheld By Request
May 7, 10:54
2
Don't we have some sort of whistleblower legislation in Canada? -- nm
-
Beryllium
May 7, 10:55
1
Lots. There's federal law and almost all provinces have something as well.
-
Name Withheld By Request
May 7, 10:58
word. -- nm
-
Beryllium
May 7, 10:45
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
