In response to
"I wonder if Adscam or Shawinigate would have been as big without unnamed sources. :) -- nm"
by
Reagen
|
Well, the latter is what prompted this particular case. An unnamed source turned over a letter tying in Chretien and RCMP determined it was a forgery
|
So they wanted to speak with the source to continue pulling the string.
As far as whether they would have emerged without unnamed sources...I don't know. There's not much appetite for investigative journalism in the industry nowadays. Look how long it took for the Mulroney stuff to make it back to the forefront.
That said, lazy journos abused the willingness to let gutless hacks go "on the record" without doing so and that hasn't improved any coverage either.
|
Responses:
|