ST Alpha - "Wow, that is supremely disappointing imo. " (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 151

In response to "$52.4 million for Iron Man 2 on Friday." by David

Wow, that is supremely disappointing imo.

Posted by Will Hunting (aka kelly) May 8 '10, 09:07

For a well-received first effort; the first blockbuster of the year; with the IMAX advantage; an extra 200 screens over Pirates #2; for it to be in the same ballpark is underwhelming.

Responses:

$4.1 million in IMAX sales. -- nm - David May 8, 09:10
Should've been in 3D. -- nm - Tim May 8, 09:08 12
- they were to far into the filming to use 3D like they'd want -- nm - Remlik May 8, 09:20 11
  - Wait, what's not in 3D? Ironman? I thought it was. -- nm - mara May 8, 09:21 9
    - I find it interesting that you are the second person on ST to assume it was in 3D. -- nm - Dano May 8, 09:37 5
      - 2nd? More like 4th. -- nm - Love Machine May 8, 10:06 1
        
        Well not every movie can be 3D worthy like Avatar. -- nm - Redmond of Persia May 8, 10:09
      - I did because my friend saw it on the theater's sign as showing in the IMAX, and he assumed 3D. -- nm - mara May 8, 09:39 2
        
        It's not a ridiculous assumption. I just find it interesting how quickly it has become common to assume that any event movie like this would be in 3D. -- nm - Dano May 8, 09:44 1
        
        yeah I think it's really become engrained on the public that Imax = 3D -- nm - Remlik May 8, 10:22
    - negative -- nm - Remlik May 8, 09:22 2
      - it is showing on Imax though. -- nm - Remlik May 8, 09:22 1
        
        Many thanks! -- nm - mara May 8, 09:39
  - but it does make a case from the studio end to make the studio think they should have converted it into 3D -- nm - Remlik May 8, 09:20

Post a message top

Wow, that is supremely disappointing imo.

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.