ST Alpha - "they were to far into the filming to use 3D like they'd want -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 151

In response to "Should've been in 3D. -- nm" by Tim

they were to far into the filming to use 3D like they'd want -- nm

Posted by Remlik (aka remlik) May 8 '10, 09:20

(No message)

Responses:

Wait, what's not in 3D? Ironman? I thought it was. -- nm - mara May 8, 09:21 9
- I find it interesting that you are the second person on ST to assume it was in 3D. -- nm - Dano May 8, 09:37 5
  - 2nd? More like 4th. -- nm - Love Machine May 8, 10:06 1
    - Well not every movie can be 3D worthy like Avatar. -- nm - Redmond of Persia May 8, 10:09
  - I did because my friend saw it on the theater's sign as showing in the IMAX, and he assumed 3D. -- nm - mara May 8, 09:39 2
    - It's not a ridiculous assumption. I just find it interesting how quickly it has become common to assume that any event movie like this would be in 3D. -- nm - Dano May 8, 09:44 1
      - yeah I think it's really become engrained on the public that Imax = 3D -- nm - Remlik May 8, 10:22
- negative -- nm - Remlik May 8, 09:22 2
  - it is showing on Imax though. -- nm - Remlik May 8, 09:22 1
    - Many thanks! -- nm - mara May 8, 09:39
but it does make a case from the studio end to make the studio think they should have converted it into 3D -- nm - Remlik May 8, 09:20

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.