Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 3, 14:19
2: Dec 3, 11:17
3: Dec 3, 07:33
4: Dec 2, 17:22
5: Dec 2, 11:48
6: Dec 2, 08:21
7: Dec 1, 17:33
8: Dec 1, 11:23
9: Nov 30, 15:54
10: Nov 30, 09:41
11: Nov 29, 16:44
12: Nov 29, 08:01
13: Nov 28, 16:19
14: Nov 28, 09:42
15: Nov 27, 18:07
16: Nov 27, 12:04
17: Nov 27, 08:26
18: Nov 26, 18:06
19: Nov 26, 12:05
20: Nov 26, 08:29
Posts: 169
In response to
"
There's the crux: We don't "have" to subsidize ag. Ag works just fine and supply/demand would be effective in setting prices.
"
by
TWuG
though certainly not without pain
Posted by
Reagen (aka Reagen)
Dec 1 '08, 09:52
lots of farmers would go under. But there's also the question of whether they deserve to. There are lots of bad farmers.
Responses:
Farming is business, if a specific farmer must have government help to stay in business, then they shouldn't be a farmer.
-
TWuG
Dec 1, 09:58
and there would be lots of good farmer who would go under as well. -- nm
-
tRuMaN
Dec 1, 09:54
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.