poll! the silent treatment: good, bad, childish, what?
Posted by
kare (aka kare)
Dec 1 '08, 10:29
|
i think it depends on the motivation, but it's usually crappy and childish.
though sometimes it's good for thought-gathering.
|
Responses:
-
... -- nm
-
David
Dec 1, 10:46
-
I like it.
-
Pippy
Dec 1, 10:42
-
Capital C childish. -- nm
-
Name Withheld By Request
Dec 1, 10:42
-
unuseful -- nm
-
znufrii
Dec 1, 10:38
-
From experience, childish and just about the quickest way to kill a relationship. -- nm
-
TWuG
Dec 1, 10:37
-
Its not just withholding communication, its withholding love -- nm
-
zeitgeist
Dec 1, 10:34
- [deleted]
-
Has it's uses.
-
Will Hunting
Dec 1, 10:32
-
*turns back to you, crosses arms, frowns* -- nm
-
Reagen
Dec 1, 10:32
-
as a punishment i think it's sort of stupid, but i agree that if the argument is going nowhere, than saying nothing for a while might help both sides. -- nm
-
El Fandie
Dec 1, 10:32
3
-
Childish -- nm
-
TFox
Dec 1, 10:31
-
Childish and stupid. -- nm
-
lileve
Dec 1, 10:31
1
-
Usually crappy and childish, but sometimes I have just felt unable to talk. So it wasn't that I was choosing not to talk out of petulance. -- nm
-
mara
Dec 1, 10:31
10
-
Mostly good, because if you are angry at someone, silence is better than saying something you'll soon regret -- nm
-
con_carne
Dec 1, 10:30
4
- [deleted]
2
-
childish and destructive, IMO. -- nm
-
loosilu in Algiers
Dec 1, 10:30
|
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
|
|