Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 11, 23:59
2: Dec 11, 14:43
3: Dec 11, 11:29
4: Dec 11, 07:59
5: Dec 10, 18:15
6: Dec 10, 12:28
7: Dec 10, 09:30
8: Dec 10, 05:59
9: Dec 9, 17:07
10: Dec 9, 13:47
11: Dec 9, 10:33
12: Dec 9, 07:33
13: Dec 8, 17:50
14: Dec 8, 10:32
15: Dec 8, 06:23
16: Dec 7, 16:52
17: Dec 7, 07:17
18: Dec 6, 14:40
19: Dec 6, 10:07
20: Dec 6, 07:32
Posts: 164
In response to
"
and we couldn't have a show like Bones if CSI hadn't happened. -- nm
"
by
loosilu
Since the first book was published a few years before CSI, I disagree.
Posted by
the wrong element, bad guy (aka JFields)
May 24 '10, 11:37
It's entirely possible that even without CSI the books could have spawned a tv series.
If CSI had been a failure, that would have made it less likely. That it was a success probably helped Bones make it to the air.
Responses:
disagree. that just means she was late to her own party. -- nm
-
loosilu
May 24, 11:38
4
Because every author's goal is to have their books televised ASAP. -- nm
-
the wrong element, bad guy
May 24, 11:44
3
not the point. Her show is not the one with all the influence. -- nm
-
loosilu
May 24, 11:47
2
I never said it was.
-
the wrong element, bad guy
May 24, 11:55
1
I think it absolutely was dependent on CSI being on TV first.
-
loosilu
May 24, 11:57
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.