Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 3, 14:19
2: Dec 3, 11:17
3: Dec 3, 07:33
4: Dec 2, 17:22
5: Dec 2, 11:48
6: Dec 2, 08:21
7: Dec 1, 17:33
8: Dec 1, 11:23
9: Nov 30, 15:54
10: Nov 30, 09:41
11: Nov 29, 16:44
12: Nov 29, 08:01
13: Nov 28, 16:19
14: Nov 28, 09:42
15: Nov 27, 18:07
16: Nov 27, 12:04
17: Nov 27, 08:26
18: Nov 26, 18:06
19: Nov 26, 12:05
20: Nov 26, 08:29
Posts: 161
In response to
"
Hm. The opponents say it's for law enforcement, but the stated purpose is to be trained to respond to terrorist attack/catastrophe -- nm
"
by
con_carne
and "to help with civil unrest and crowd control" -- nm
Posted by
znufrii
Dec 2 '08, 14:09
(No message)
Responses:
Would it be correct to say, IYO, that this is what the National Guard is for? (that might be the better solution) -- nm
-
con_carne
Dec 2, 14:15
5
no, the National Guard operates under the same legal restrictions. -- nm
-
loosilu in Algiers
Dec 2, 14:17
exactly
-
znufrii
Dec 2, 14:16
3
trained? that's what I did for 3.5 years and they're better trained than the Army, which gets zero training for natural disasters.
-
loosilu in Algiers
Dec 2, 14:19
2
then is doesn't make much sense for the Army to be suddenly jumping into this role on a full time basis then, does it?
-
znufrii
Dec 2, 14:21
1
I don't know what they're up to. Our training program moved to NORTHCOM a year ago so this is not a new push by a long shot.
-
loosilu in Algiers
Dec 2, 14:23
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
