Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 4, 12:27
2: Dec 4, 09:36
3: Dec 4, 02:38
4: Dec 3, 14:19
5: Dec 3, 11:17
6: Dec 3, 07:33
7: Dec 2, 17:22
8: Dec 2, 11:48
9: Dec 2, 08:21
10: Dec 1, 17:33
11: Dec 1, 11:23
12: Nov 30, 15:54
13: Nov 30, 09:41
14: Nov 29, 16:44
15: Nov 29, 08:01
16: Nov 28, 16:19
17: Nov 28, 09:42
18: Nov 27, 18:07
19: Nov 27, 12:04
20: Nov 27, 08:26
Posts: 153
In response to
"
That's nonsense. Either it's a legit record or it's not.
"
by
musubi
Barry Bonds as MLB HR leader is exactly as legit as Hank Aaron was. yes or no?
Posted by
Reagen (aka Reagen)
Jun 5 '10, 09:41
If no, why not? If two records can be viewed as having different levels of legitimacy, then you agree with our point.
Responses:
Yes. Bonds is the HR record holder. (nm)
-
musubi
Jun 5, 09:41
3
Do you find yourself actually having the same level of caring for 762 as you do 755?
-
Will Hunting
Jun 5, 09:45
2
like, here's the thing - I didn't actually know what Bonds' #s, but I still know 755. -- nm
-
Reagen
Jun 5, 09:46
I don't care about either all that much. They're records.
-
musubi
Jun 5, 09:46
win -- nm
-
TFox
Jun 5, 09:41
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.