ST Alpha - "I'd still take the too-short movie trend for awhile to reverse the gawd-awful "goes on at least an hour too long" trend. -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 159

I'd still take the too-short movie trend for awhile to reverse the gawd-awful "goes on at least an hour too long" trend. -- nm

Posted by Name Withheld By Request (aka BlueKopo) Jun 18 '10, 08:23

(No message)

Responses:

I agree -- nm - Beryllium (iPhone) Jun 18, 08:24
As Ebert says, no good movie is too long and no bad movie is too short. -- nm - Reagen Jun 18, 08:24 4
- See, I disagree with this. An over-extended movie length can actively disaude someone from watching it. Even if it's not a bad movie. - Name Withheld By Request Jun 18, 08:28 2
  - I can agree with you to an extent, especially with BB. I doubt I'll ever watch it, mostly because I'm not that interested in it... - Shaun Jun 18, 08:35
  - Re you IM, it was a massive burden to get through. -- nm - LMS Jun 18, 08:32
- *ding* If a movie is awesome, it could be 5 hours for all I care. -- nm - Shaun Jun 18, 08:26
I agree with this and even an 80 minute film like When in Rome can still feel like forever. -- nm - David Jun 18, 08:23

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.