Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 1, 17:33
2: Dec 1, 11:23
3: Nov 30, 15:54
4: Nov 30, 09:41
5: Nov 29, 16:44
6: Nov 29, 08:01
7: Nov 28, 16:19
8: Nov 28, 09:42
9: Nov 27, 18:07
10: Nov 27, 12:04
11: Nov 27, 08:26
12: Nov 26, 18:06
13: Nov 26, 12:05
14: Nov 26, 08:29
15: Nov 25, 18:33
16: Nov 25, 11:12
17: Nov 25, 07:08
18: Nov 24, 13:17
19: Nov 23, 18:13
20: Nov 23, 06:17
Posts: 163
In response to
"
I don't understand why Apple is censoring for content. How is it their business? -- nm
"
by
Reagen
Apple didn't censor. They declined to sell it as it was. The creators made the change. -- nm
Posted by
Dano (aka dano)
Jun 19 '10, 09:09
(No message)
Responses:
in order for the book to be sold they had to do as Apple asked or it wouldn't be sold. -- nm
-
Remlik
Jun 19, 09:15
26
So if I bring my crappy comic book into your store, you have to sell it? -- nm
-
Dano
Jun 19, 09:16
7
If I was selling something that was even worse, sure. Like Apple is doing with Kick Ass. -- nm
-
Remlik
Jun 19, 10:10
Of course not but they didn't decide it was a crappy comic and not worth selling. They decided the content was inappropriate and that was why they
-
Krusty
Jun 19, 09:20
sell it or don't sell it. But don't bowdlerize it.
-
Reagen
Jun 19, 09:20
4
The publisher made the decision to change it. Apple just refused to offer it without the change. The publisher could refuse the change & go elsewhere. -- nm
-
Dano
Jun 19, 09:22
3
that's very true. -- nm
-
Remlik
Jun 19, 10:09
a distinction without a difference. -- nm
-
Reagen
Jun 19, 09:25
yes sure
-
Danedukenuuk
Jun 19, 09:24
on the iPad. -- nm
-
TFox
Jun 19, 09:16
Mr. Berry said that he did not feel �remotely censored by Apple.� �It�s their rules,� he said. �We�re coming to their dinner party at their house.� -- nm
-
Dano
Jun 19, 09:16
16
He may not have felt censored but that's what happened, Apple censored his comic.
-
Krusty
Jun 19, 09:18
15
I don't agree with Apple, but it's not censorship. -- nm
-
Dano
Jun 19, 09:21
14
I don't see how it's not censorship. They comic is fine with them except for some nudity which they say has to be changed for them to sell the comic.
-
Krusty
Jun 19, 09:22
13
Because there are other outlets for the publisher to sell the comic as is. -- nm
-
Dano
Jun 19, 09:24
12
as long as someone else collect the oil BP is not having a spill? -- nm
-
Danedukenuuk
Jun 19, 09:29
That's true, but the fact there are other outlets doesn't change the nature of Apple's actions.
-
celedhring
Jun 19, 09:27
1
Exaclty. It's censorship no matter how you look at. -- nm
-
Krusty
Jun 19, 09:29
so as ling as a single printer will print the political statement it's not censoship? -- nm
-
Danedukenuuk
Jun 19, 09:26
Also, by that logic, China isn't censoring Google. -- nm
-
Reagen
Jun 19, 09:25
4
If Google is agreeing to the terms that China sets up to be available in China, then it's not censorship. -- nm
-
Dano
Jun 19, 09:27
3
by that logic the press is free in NothKorea
-
Danedukenuuk
Jun 19, 09:31
Then censorship doesn't exist by your reasoning. You're always "accepting the rules" if you are seeking approval from anybody. -- nm
-
celedhring
Jun 19, 09:30
I find that ridiculous. -- nm
-
Reagen
Jun 19, 09:28
For now. -- nm
-
Reagen
Jun 19, 09:25
2
That's a problem of media consolidation, not of censorship. -- nm
-
Dano
Jun 19, 09:27
1
it's why censorship is a problem. -- nm
-
Reagen
Jun 19, 09:29
yes thats a real difference -- nm
-
Danedukenuuk
Jun 19, 09:11
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.