ST Alpha - "in order for the book to be sold they had to do as Apple asked or it wouldn't be sold. -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 163

In response to "Apple didn't censor. They declined to sell it as it was. The creators made the change. -- nm" by Dano

in order for the book to be sold they had to do as Apple asked or it wouldn't be sold. -- nm

Posted by Remlik (aka remlik) Jun 19 '10, 09:15

(No message)

Responses:

So if I bring my crappy comic book into your store, you have to sell it? -- nm - Dano Jun 19, 09:16 7
- If I was selling something that was even worse, sure. Like Apple is doing with Kick Ass. -- nm - Remlik Jun 19, 10:10
- Of course not but they didn't decide it was a crappy comic and not worth selling. They decided the content was inappropriate and that was why they - Krusty Jun 19, 09:20
- sell it or don't sell it. But don't bowdlerize it. - Reagen Jun 19, 09:20 4
  - The publisher made the decision to change it. Apple just refused to offer it without the change. The publisher could refuse the change & go elsewhere. -- nm - Dano Jun 19, 09:22 3
    - that's very true. -- nm - Remlik Jun 19, 10:09
    - a distinction without a difference. -- nm - Reagen Jun 19, 09:25
    - yes sure - Danedukenuuk Jun 19, 09:24
on the iPad. -- nm - TFox Jun 19, 09:16
Mr. Berry said that he did not feel �remotely censored by Apple.� �It�s their rules,� he said. �We�re coming to their dinner party at their house.� -- nm - Dano Jun 19, 09:16 16
- He may not have felt censored but that's what happened, Apple censored his comic. - Krusty Jun 19, 09:18 15
  - I don't agree with Apple, but it's not censorship. -- nm - Dano Jun 19, 09:21 14
    - I don't see how it's not censorship. They comic is fine with them except for some nudity which they say has to be changed for them to sell the comic. - Krusty Jun 19, 09:22 13
      - Because there are other outlets for the publisher to sell the comic as is. -- nm - Dano Jun 19, 09:24 12
        
        as long as someone else collect the oil BP is not having a spill? -- nm - Danedukenuuk Jun 19, 09:29
        
        That's true, but the fact there are other outlets doesn't change the nature of Apple's actions. - celedhring Jun 19, 09:27 1
        
        Exaclty. It's censorship no matter how you look at. -- nm - Krusty Jun 19, 09:29
        
        so as ling as a single printer will print the political statement it's not censoship? -- nm - Danedukenuuk Jun 19, 09:26
        
        Also, by that logic, China isn't censoring Google. -- nm - Reagen Jun 19, 09:25 4
        
        If Google is agreeing to the terms that China sets up to be available in China, then it's not censorship. -- nm - Dano Jun 19, 09:27 3
        
        by that logic the press is free in NothKorea - Danedukenuuk Jun 19, 09:31
        
        Then censorship doesn't exist by your reasoning. You're always "accepting the rules" if you are seeking approval from anybody. -- nm - celedhring Jun 19, 09:30
        
        I find that ridiculous. -- nm - Reagen Jun 19, 09:28
        
        For now. -- nm - Reagen Jun 19, 09:25 2
        
        That's a problem of media consolidation, not of censorship. -- nm - Dano Jun 19, 09:27 1
        
        it's why censorship is a problem. -- nm - Reagen Jun 19, 09:29

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.