ST Alpha - "No, it didn't. This was added to the re-releases. -- (link)" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 158

In response to "ummm, those were the numbers right from the beginning. The first crawl started with "Episode IV" -- nm" by zork

No, it didn't. This was added to the re-releases. -- (link)

Posted by Reagen (aka Reagen) Jun 19 '10, 13:58

(No message)

"The film was originally released as Star Wars, without Episode IV or the subtitle A New Hope." (en.wikipedia.org)

Responses:

right, but still that was 1981 and Lucas had always envisioned it as 4. I think 29 years is enough time for TWuG to have gotten used to it. - zork Jun 19, 14:11 3
- My point is, even if the roll said "Episode IV" we'd be calling it #1 because Phantom Menace wouldn't exist. - TWuG Jun 19, 14:48
- OK, but that's not "right from the beginning".. - Reagen Jun 19, 14:14 1
  - *submits self for a vicious wet noodling* - zork Jun 19, 14:21

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.