ST Alpha - "Loosi: I think he means that, since we have full control of the site, we should consider reimplementing features that were ruined by brats -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 151

Loosi: I think he means that, since we have full control of the site, we should consider reimplementing features that were ruined by brats -- nm

Posted by Beryllium (iPhone) (aka grayman) Jun 19 '10, 18:06

(No message)

Responses:

Oh, I see. Well, ruined or not, it sucks. no avatars please. -- nm - loosilu Jun 19, 18:10
Exactly. - Black Rabbit Jun 19, 18:07 19
- If you want to be able to post a pic within a post so that it's visible without linking, I think that'd be cool. - TWuG Jun 19, 18:11
- you want to take it back? Put in a delete button for your own posts. -- nm - loosilu Jun 19, 18:11 17
  - Nah. It's leave orphan posts and would generally be a way for someone to avoid responsibility for what they say. - TWuG Jun 19, 18:13 16
    - Posts from Estonian dwarfs? -- nm - Dano Jun 19, 19:04 1
      - Surprisingly common. -- nm - TWuG Jun 19, 19:08
    - It might be nice for typo correction and whatnot. Maybe if no replies and less than a couple minutes old... -- nm - Ender Jun 19, 18:43
    - even Usenet let you delete posts 20 years ago. -- nm - loosilu Jun 19, 18:15 12
      - This isn't Usenet. And I'd very much dislike people hiding behind a delete or edit feature. -- nm - TWuG Jun 19, 18:20 11
        
        There are good and bad reasons for it. good would be for accidentally posting a spoiler in the subject line. - Redmond Jun 19, 18:45 9
        
        For things like that, I'd rather see the ability to "scribble" (for lack of a better word) specific posts. - TWuG Jun 19, 18:50 7
        
        or just allow the person who posted to scribble themselves -- nm - Roger More Jun 19, 18:56 3
        
        Go scribble yourself. -- nm - David Jun 19, 19:03
        
        you could even have it so the post appears scribbled on the board, but when you click on it you can see the original post -- nm - Roger More Jun 19, 18:57 1
        
        That was a given, I thought. And only allowing the poster to scribble themselves does nothing for - TWuG Jun 19, 18:58
        
        hmmm, interesting variation. -- nm - loosilu Jun 19, 18:56
        
        That works for me -- nm - Redmond Jun 19, 18:51 1
        
        I know what you are saying though. I saw a facebook thread that had a bunch of angry posts. - Redmond Jun 19, 18:52
        
        What would be nice is if you could post over it. Redo the subject line but the old subject line and IM could not be altered, just buried below a new - Redmond Jun 19, 18:48
        
        God forbid ST should be deprived of nailing people for the exact wording of the first thing they said on a topic! - loosilu Jun 19, 18:43

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.