Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Nov 29, 16:44
2: Nov 29, 08:01
3: Nov 28, 16:19
4: Nov 28, 09:42
5: Nov 27, 18:07
6: Nov 27, 12:04
7: Nov 27, 08:26
8: Nov 26, 18:06
9: Nov 26, 12:05
10: Nov 26, 08:29
11: Nov 25, 18:33
12: Nov 25, 11:12
13: Nov 25, 07:08
14: Nov 24, 13:17
15: Nov 23, 18:13
16: Nov 23, 06:17
17: Nov 22, 13:24
18: Nov 22, 09:09
19: Nov 21, 22:36
20: Nov 21, 14:03
Posts: 154
In response to
"
That's good. make it longer than 7 years. -- nm
"
by
Will Hunting
It's fine by me. If you walk away, you should get punished. But some people still need to walk away. -- nm
Posted by
Mop (222 lbs) (aka rburriel)
Jun 23 '10, 15:02
(No message)
Responses:
i don't understand why it's not just as acceptable for the bank to get the property as it is for them to get the mortgage payments. If the two are not
-
mara
Jun 23, 15:06
32
Becuase they were comparable when the loan was made.
-
Will Hunting
Jun 23, 15:14
26
its never a fair deal
-
lafarrow
Jun 23, 15:16
25
Yeah.....that ability to refinance on the homeowner's whim....that the bank never comes back to when prices have no question jumped.....
-
Will Hunting
Jun 23, 15:17
24
I think the very nature of a mortgage is a bank saying, in effect, if you don't pay, we get your house. The borrower is saying, okay, it's a deal. -- nm
-
mara
Jun 23, 15:19
22
Until someone forces me to sign that deal, it's equally on me.
-
Will Hunting
Jun 23, 15:22
19
You don't feel that the institution with hundreds, if not thousands, of employees and far more capital has a tad more leverage and thus more
-
musubi
Jun 23, 15:25
12
No. I believe my life, my home, my money....I have a far bigger responsibility to my own economic situation
-
Will Hunting
Jun 23, 15:29
11
so if i read the contract in a way that you think is unfair you'll still
-
lafarrow
Jun 23, 15:33
2
What's unfair about on the 1st of each month, you'll pay $$$ for this property that as of Date has $$$ value.
-
Will Hunting
Jun 23, 15:36
1
Except the banks crashed the market by loaning to people that couldn't pay, and the honest people are supposed to pay on a devalued property.
-
Redmond
Jun 23, 15:46
I should clarify, this is not specific to those who walk away from loans they have the ability to pay.
-
musubi
Jun 23, 15:33
7
I think lenders should make the wisest decisions for their interests.
-
Will Hunting
Jun 23, 15:34
6
Therein lies the rub. As the big guy who has little to lose (and can absorb many bad mortages) shouldn't the onus be there to do the rigth thing?
-
musubi
Jun 23, 15:40
4
If it weren't for market regulations, they would operate the same as loan sharks for maximum shareholder revenue. -- nm
-
Beryllium
Jun 23, 15:41
3
(And, frankly, this is exactly what they did, and exactly what caused the collapse) -- nm
-
Beryllium
Jun 23, 15:43
2
Yup. And as corporations there's no "personal responsibilty" to scold them about.
-
musubi
Jun 23, 15:44
1
Well they should be going to jail but that isn't going to happen. Lie Steal Cheat and be rich with no risk of prison. -- nm
-
Redmond
Jun 23, 15:54
they don't really have a good track record for this. -- nm
-
Beryllium
Jun 23, 15:37
are you kidding me
-
lafarrow
Jun 23, 15:23
5
Sure they do....they find other sources of money willing to make better deals for that loan
-
Will Hunting
Jun 23, 15:25
4
With a million options which makes almost any apple to apple comparison impossible.
-
musubi
Jun 23, 15:28
take a vote of your fellow TTers right now
-
lafarrow
Jun 23, 15:27
2
IM: not to play? What, and end up renting? Those are the *real* retards!
-
Dr.Vermin
Jun 23, 15:33
1
everything in cash baby
-
lafarrow
Jun 23, 15:36
the issue is the deficiency - meaning the bank doesn't just
-
lafarrow
Jun 23, 15:21
1
[deleted]
its not on your whim as a homeowner
-
lafarrow
Jun 23, 15:19
they take a haircut on the foreclosure sale in this market -- nm
-
chuckles
Jun 23, 15:10
1
banks never lose -- nm
-
lafarrow
Jun 23, 15:15
Because in many cases the property isn't worth what they loaned on it. -- nm
-
MojaveMeg
Jun 23, 15:09
1
BI think that's their problem. They're the ones holding the mortgage. -- nm
-
mara
Jun 23, 15:16
Banks want to have their cake and eat it, too. Clearly the two are not comparable since the crash.
-
Mop (222 lbs)
Jun 23, 15:09
If you read the first line of the article, it says this is toward those people who have the means to pay but walk away. -- nm
-
Will Hunting
Jun 23, 15:03
10
Yes, I get that. And I mean those people. Makes no sense to be paying on an overpriced house, even if you can. -- nm
-
Mop (222 lbs)
Jun 23, 15:04
9
I'm confused by your entire tack on this.
-
Will Hunting
Jun 23, 15:06
8
I think Mop is saying that yes, they should be "punished", but that for *some* people it would still make sense to walk away.
-
musubi
Jun 23, 15:13
7
Exactly. There's a price to pay for breaking a contract. But the price may still be worth it. -- nm
-
Mop (222 lbs)
Jun 23, 15:20
punish the banks -- nm
-
lafarrow
Jun 23, 15:13
5
Because they didn't renegotiate? -- nm
-
Mop (222 lbs)
Jun 23, 15:16
4
b/c they make the rules and have all of the information
-
lafarrow
Jun 23, 15:17
3
FIGHT THE POWAH -- nm
-
Dr.Vermin
Jun 23, 15:21
1
its the only way to be sure man
-
lafarrow
Jun 23, 15:22
I....agree....with laf? (nm)
-
musubi
Jun 23, 15:20
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.