Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 4, 12:27
2: Dec 4, 09:36
3: Dec 4, 02:38
4: Dec 3, 14:19
5: Dec 3, 11:17
6: Dec 3, 07:33
7: Dec 2, 17:22
8: Dec 2, 11:48
9: Dec 2, 08:21
10: Dec 1, 17:33
11: Dec 1, 11:23
12: Nov 30, 15:54
13: Nov 30, 09:41
14: Nov 29, 16:44
15: Nov 29, 08:01
16: Nov 28, 16:19
17: Nov 28, 09:42
18: Nov 27, 18:07
19: Nov 27, 12:04
20: Nov 27, 08:26
Posts: 163
In response to
"
so 3 times as many viewers as that NHL game 6 that people got excited about the ratings for....nm
"
by
x
Comparing apples to apples (and stepping on the neck of this), 52.6 million people watched at least a portion of the gold medal hockey game. -- nm
Posted by
David (aka David)
Jul 13 '10, 10:44
(No message)
Responses:
i don't mean to say in any relative sense that it means soccer is more popular than hockey or some such. all i mean is that if a sport that is...
-
x
Jul 13, 10:51
3
More than anything, I think it's like The Decision, a credit to ESPN's marketing team.
-
David
Jul 13, 11:20
1
i think that undersells the importance of univision in the equation....nm
-
x
Jul 13, 11:36
No! It's Thunderdome! -- nm
-
Reagen
Jul 13, 10:56
comparing apples to apples, I think 27.6 million is the number you're looking for. -- (link)
-
znufrii
Jul 13, 10:47
10
No, 52.6M was the number I was looking for. -- nm
-
David
Jul 13, 10:49
9
well, then. so much for an "apples to apples" comparison. -- nm
-
znufrii
Jul 13, 10:52
8
See, what I did was post an unquestioned number that is -higher-; what you have to do now is find one that surpasses it. That's how it works. Get it? -- nm
-
David
Jul 13, 11:10
7
ummm, no.
-
znufrii
Jul 13, 11:13
6
Of course you don't since it hurts your initial argument.
-
David
Jul 13, 11:17
5
and besides, you have yet to provide the promised "apples to apples" comparison. -- nm
-
znufrii
Jul 13, 11:21
2
52.6 -- nm
-
David
Jul 13, 11:24
1
*sigh* -- nm
-
znufrii
Jul 13, 11:26
what argument? -- nm
-
znufrii
Jul 13, 11:20
1
Disingenuous. -- nm
-
David
Jul 13, 11:21
how many people watched at least a portion of the final world cup game? -- nm
-
chuckles
Jul 13, 10:45
12
You'd have to ask znufrii. It wouldn't surprise me if a bunch of people watched it and turned it off after 90 minutes of nothing happening, though. -- nm
-
David
Jul 13, 10:47
11
if you play the soccer is boring card once more, i'm going to start making public how exciting i think baseball stat discussions are....nm
-
x
Jul 13, 10:58
10
Joykiller. -- nm
-
David
Jul 13, 11:10
how about soccer stats? I bet those are riviting conversations -- nm
-
dogbert
Jul 13, 11:06
7
soccer has stats? -- nm
-
znufrii
Jul 13, 11:10
they are, actually. to people interested in them, just like baseball stat discussions are. the difference being.....
-
x
Jul 13, 11:09
5
do people keep telling you how exciting the conversations are, and then when you say you don't enjoy them scoff at you? -- nm
-
dogbert
Jul 13, 11:11
4
does anyone think any of the stat discussions are exciting? interesting to some, sure, but exciting? -- nm
-
b.
Jul 13, 11:12
1
the only people who would find them exciting are the people in the conversation
-
dogbert
Jul 13, 11:17
i've never done that to you, so i'm not sure why you're crying at me....nm
-
x
Jul 13, 11:12
1
never claimed that you did. not meaning to cry at you, you just happen to be the other side of the conversation. it was just using it to make a joke
-
dogbert
Jul 13, 11:16
And yet baseball stat discussions are STILL less boring than soccer on TV. -- nm
-
Jim
Jul 13, 11:06
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.