ST Alpha - "If Halladay's not part of the equation, then there isn't a question" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 152

In response to "2 things: Halladay wasn't part of my question. :) 2...even when a pitcher I've never heard of for the Cardinals starts to implode..." by Jim

If Halladay's not part of the equation, then there isn't a question

Posted by Will Hunting (aka JoeMetz) Jul 29 '10, 11:41

They gave up Lee to get Halladay. This is a direct action/outcome scenario.

Responses:

They didn't have to is the problem with that. They could have done prospects but they chose to pick Halladay instead of Lee. - David Jul 29, 11:45
They didn't give up Lee to get Halladay. Two seperate deals. (nm) - musubi, adorable Jul 29, 11:44
Was that all the same trade? I thought it was a couple different trades...but I could be misremembering. -- nm - Jim Jul 29, 11:43 5
- Yeah, 3 team deal with Lee going to Seattle, prospects going everywhere and Halladay coming to Philly. - Will Hunting Jul 29, 11:44 4
  - Wrong. Toronto deal with PHI was a straight swap, and the Lee swap with SEA was seperate. TOR and SEA made no contact with each other. (nm) - musubi, adorable Jul 29, 11:45 3
    - Hrmm, okay. -- nm - Will Hunting Jul 29, 11:53
    - Yep. Jays got only prospects - all from the Philly organization. Drabek, C Travis D'Arnaud and a bat they flipped to Oakland for Brett Wallace. -- nm - Name Withheld By Request Jul 29, 11:48 1
      - Plus, the Jays kicked in $6M cash to pay a portion of 2010 salary for him. -- nm - Name Withheld By Request Jul 29, 11:49

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.