ST Alpha - "Then why are the steroid guys considered cheaters? -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 156

In response to "None of them are tainted anymore than Hank Aaron's HRs were tainted by greenies, or Ruth's HRs were tainted by segregation." by zombie musubi

Then why are the steroid guys considered cheaters? -- nm

Posted by Jim (aka Jim) Aug 4 '10, 09:16

(No message)

Responses:

I don't like them, but I don't consider them cheaters. The HRs are on the books, they're legit. (nm) - zombie musubi Aug 4, 09:20 3
- like it or not, baseball did not test, so players took advantage.... - groiny Aug 4, 09:22 2
  - That one is a much uglier can of worms. (nm) - zombie musubi Aug 4, 09:28 1
    - besides that he got busted, he also quit on his team. - groiny Aug 4, 09:29
who considers them cheaters? - groiny Aug 4, 09:18 5
- HOF voters, for one. Many current and retired players. Writers, reporters. Seriously? McGwire and bonds are thought to be the biggest cheaters in - Jim Aug 4, 09:19 4
  - HOF voters also voted Jim Rice in before Bert Blylevin. They get lots of stuff wrong. (nm) - zombie musubi Aug 4, 09:21
  - HOF voters are retards. - groiny Aug 4, 09:21 2
    - No they didn't...so I guess it's cool then. Carry on. -- nm - Jim Aug 4, 09:22 1
      - You can not segregate them for cheating when they never tested - groiny Aug 4, 09:24

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.