ST Alpha - "They probably benefitted, but the point is: So? " (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 165

In response to "People are pissed off at it in general, they point ot the highest profile person, but let's be honest, they helped who took." by Will Hunting

They probably benefitted, but the point is: So?

Posted by zombie musubi (aka musubi) Aug 4 '10, 09:46

Lots of players did. They was an economic incentive to do roids and zero negative economic consequences.

It's like Reggie Bush's heisman season. They can vacate teh team wins, they can take away his trophy, but it still happened. And that was *actual* breaking of the rules, not some mushy grey area.

Responses:

the ends justify the means?....nm - xi Aug 4, 09:51 3
- Not really. But so long as it wasn't against the rules.... - zombie musubi Aug 4, 09:57
- happens in every sport. - groiny Aug 4, 09:53 1
  - sure. but baseball got what it wanted out of having no testing, so their ends mostly justify their means as well... - xi Aug 4, 09:59

Post a message top

They probably benefitted, but the point is: So?

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.