Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 1, 11:23
2: Nov 30, 15:54
3: Nov 30, 09:41
4: Nov 29, 16:44
5: Nov 29, 08:01
6: Nov 28, 16:19
7: Nov 28, 09:42
8: Nov 27, 18:07
9: Nov 27, 12:04
10: Nov 27, 08:26
11: Nov 26, 18:06
12: Nov 26, 12:05
13: Nov 26, 08:29
14: Nov 25, 18:33
15: Nov 25, 11:12
16: Nov 25, 07:08
17: Nov 24, 13:17
18: Nov 23, 18:13
19: Nov 23, 06:17
20: Nov 22, 13:24
Posts: 155
In response to
"
I would think in almost every case, the costs incurred from layoffs (severance pay, lost expertise, reduced productivity, low morale, etc...)
"
by
znufrii
but you're right, the way some of the companies are managed it's not outlandish to think that a CEO might be that stupid. -- nm
Posted by
znufrii
Dec 8 '08, 12:27
(No message)
Responses:
I would see that line of thought (that of fire now, hire next year) getting traction in the small business community, 0 to 30 workers size companies
-
Loyola
Dec 8, 12:33
2
I would think the margins would be even slimmer, and the downside risks much higher for such a business. -- nm
-
znufrii
Dec 8, 12:40
1
The point that I have yet to see refuted is, while no one is going to lay people off b/c of a chance at tax credits later...
-
TFox
Dec 8, 12:44
[deleted]
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.