Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 4, 02:38
2: Dec 3, 14:19
3: Dec 3, 11:17
4: Dec 3, 07:33
5: Dec 2, 17:22
6: Dec 2, 11:48
7: Dec 2, 08:21
8: Dec 1, 17:33
9: Dec 1, 11:23
10: Nov 30, 15:54
11: Nov 30, 09:41
12: Nov 29, 16:44
13: Nov 29, 08:01
14: Nov 28, 16:19
15: Nov 28, 09:42
16: Nov 27, 18:07
17: Nov 27, 12:04
18: Nov 27, 08:26
19: Nov 26, 18:06
20: Nov 26, 12:05
Posts: 169
In response to
"
I seriously wonder what it's going to take to have a serious third party emerge. -- nm
"
by
Dano
Serious Question: What makes you think a third party would make it better? -- nm
Posted by
NWBR on iPhone (aka BlueKopo)
Aug 12 '10, 13:56
(No message)
Responses:
Forget about better, it just makes no sense that both parties have approvals in the 20% range and yet a 3rd party can't emerge. -- nm
-
Dano
Aug 12, 13:57
8
maybe the electorate is to blame after all -- nm
-
crash davis
Aug 12, 13:58
7
*ding*. There's a, dare I say it, personal responsibilty aspect to this problem. -- nm
-
NWBR on iPhone
Aug 12, 14:00
6
[deleted]
5
come live in California to see the awesomeness in action -- nm
-
moles
Aug 12, 14:07
4
[deleted]
3
Relatedly, I saw there is a movement for a balanced budget amendment, as well as a 2/3 supermajority to raise taxes -- (link)
-
Roger More
Aug 12, 14:12
2
[deleted]
1
If it's over the economic cycle, a balanced budget amendment might be OK (Britain does this) but year-on-year it's not a good idea. Gov't needs fiscal
-
Roger More
Aug 12, 14:17
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
