Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 1, 17:33
2: Dec 1, 11:23
3: Nov 30, 15:54
4: Nov 30, 09:41
5: Nov 29, 16:44
6: Nov 29, 08:01
7: Nov 28, 16:19
8: Nov 28, 09:42
9: Nov 27, 18:07
10: Nov 27, 12:04
11: Nov 27, 08:26
12: Nov 26, 18:06
13: Nov 26, 12:05
14: Nov 26, 08:29
15: Nov 25, 18:33
16: Nov 25, 11:12
17: Nov 25, 07:08
18: Nov 24, 13:17
19: Nov 23, 18:13
20: Nov 23, 06:17
Posts: 159
Liriano has been stellar, but that BABIP is in line with his batted ball profile. (nm)
Posted by
musubi
Aug 13 '10, 12:12
That HR rate has to regress to the mean, that BABIP might not for a while.
Responses:
If you gave me one stat to analyze pitchers, it would be WHIP.
-
groiny
Aug 13, 12:16
3
[deleted]
2
oh, and for you from BB, the reason the AL Central is always tightly contested....
-
groiny
Aug 13, 12:21
1
[deleted]
Whoops. Looked at the wrong number. It is a little inflated. Still, it's in line. That HR number isn't.
-
musubi
Aug 13, 12:15
3
so you ignore the runners allowed per 9 innings?
-
groiny
Aug 13, 12:20
2
You don't ignore it, but it's not the end all be all. Single point analysis rarely works in baseball. Liriano has been fabulous at many things.
-
musubi
Aug 13, 12:23
1
which I gave him credit for. 2 HR in 140 innings is insane.
-
groiny
Aug 13, 12:27
[deleted]
21
And his LD% is something like ~20+, which typically correlates to a .320 BABIP +/- .010.
-
musubi
Aug 13, 12:18
1
[deleted]
Look at Price, Weaver, Pavano, Lee, Cahill, Danks, CC......
-
groiny
Aug 13, 12:17
18
Pavano? Cahill? CC? Really? You're gonna hang your hat on those? Liriano's easily been better than all three. Easily. (nm)
-
musubi
Aug 13, 12:21
16
It is like you guys are looking at XBox stats or something......
-
groiny
Aug 13, 12:26
11
Weaver and Danks (maaaaaybe CC) at least have an arguement. Cahill and Pavano? Nuh-uh. (nm)
-
musubi
Aug 13, 12:32
9
You might want to look at Cahill's numbers again, and Pavano too while you ar at it.
-
groiny
Aug 13, 12:35
8
[deleted]
7
Cahill allows a .192 batting average against, 11 homers in 133 innings
-
groiny
Aug 13, 12:43
6
Cahill is very good. Liriano has been better. (nm)
-
musubi
Aug 13, 12:48
1
oh sweet jesus. nm -- nm
-
groiny
Aug 13, 12:50
[deleted]
3
lmao
-
groiny
Aug 13, 12:46
2
[deleted]
1
your ability to circumvent a tried and true stat is amazing.
-
groiny
Aug 13, 12:49
[deleted]
I just looked at Price's numbers. He's Liriano-lite. not sure why you think he's better than Liriano.
-
musubi
Aug 13, 12:26
3
Because he's a Commodore.
-
TFox
Aug 13, 12:27
2
a brick .... house? -- nm
-
Reagen
Aug 13, 12:32
70's R&B groups just don't do it for me. (nm)
-
musubi
Aug 13, 12:29
[deleted]
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.