ST Alpha - "Pavano? Cahill? CC? Really? You're gonna hang your hat on those? Liriano's easily been better than all three. Easily. (nm)" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 159

In response to "Look at Price, Weaver, Pavano, Lee, Cahill, Danks, CC......" by groiny

Pavano? Cahill? CC? Really? You're gonna hang your hat on those? Liriano's easily been better than all three. Easily. (nm)

Posted by musubi Aug 13 '10, 12:21

.

Responses:

It is like you guys are looking at XBox stats or something...... - groiny Aug 13, 12:26 11
- Weaver and Danks (maaaaaybe CC) at least have an arguement. Cahill and Pavano? Nuh-uh. (nm) - musubi Aug 13, 12:32 9
  - You might want to look at Cahill's numbers again, and Pavano too while you ar at it. - groiny Aug 13, 12:35 8
    - [deleted] 7
      - Cahill allows a .192 batting average against, 11 homers in 133 innings - groiny Aug 13, 12:43 6
        
        Cahill is very good. Liriano has been better. (nm) - musubi Aug 13, 12:48 1
        
        oh sweet jesus. nm -- nm - groiny Aug 13, 12:50
        
        [deleted] 3
        
        lmao - groiny Aug 13, 12:46 2
        
        [deleted] 1
        
        your ability to circumvent a tried and true stat is amazing. - groiny Aug 13, 12:49
- [deleted]
I just looked at Price's numbers. He's Liriano-lite. not sure why you think he's better than Liriano. - musubi Aug 13, 12:26 3
- Because he's a Commodore. - TFox Aug 13, 12:27 2
  - a brick .... house? -- nm - Reagen Aug 13, 12:32
  - 70's R&B groups just don't do it for me. (nm) - musubi Aug 13, 12:29

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.