ST Alpha - "Weaver and Danks (maaaaaybe CC) at least have an arguement. Cahill and Pavano? Nuh-uh. (nm)" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 159

In response to "It is like you guys are looking at XBox stats or something......" by groiny

Weaver and Danks (maaaaaybe CC) at least have an arguement. Cahill and Pavano? Nuh-uh. (nm)

Posted by musubi Aug 13 '10, 12:32

.

Responses:

You might want to look at Cahill's numbers again, and Pavano too while you ar at it. - groiny Aug 13, 12:35 8
- [deleted] 7
  - Cahill allows a .192 batting average against, 11 homers in 133 innings - groiny Aug 13, 12:43 6
    - Cahill is very good. Liriano has been better. (nm) - musubi Aug 13, 12:48 1
      - oh sweet jesus. nm -- nm - groiny Aug 13, 12:50
    - [deleted] 3
      - lmao - groiny Aug 13, 12:46 2
        
        [deleted] 1
        
        your ability to circumvent a tried and true stat is amazing. - groiny Aug 13, 12:49

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.