ST Alpha - "You might want to look at Cahill's numbers again, and Pavano too while you ar at it." (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 159

In response to "Weaver and Danks (maaaaaybe CC) at least have an arguement. Cahill and Pavano? Nuh-uh. (nm)" by musubi

You might want to look at Cahill's numbers again, and Pavano too while you ar at it.

Posted by groiny (aka groiny) Aug 13 '10, 12:35

Liriano is allowing a good .249 BA against, and 29 doubes,4 triples to go with 2 homers, not bad at all. He benefits from the best defensive catcher in the AL, so those singles do not turn into doubles via SB (8 SB AGAINST IS GOOD)

How did this man lose 7 games when he is like Thor on the mound, hurling lightning bolts at hitters?

Responses:

[deleted] 7
- Cahill allows a .192 batting average against, 11 homers in 133 innings - groiny Aug 13, 12:43 6
  - Cahill is very good. Liriano has been better. (nm) - musubi Aug 13, 12:48 1
    - oh sweet jesus. nm -- nm - groiny Aug 13, 12:50
  - [deleted] 3
    - lmao - groiny Aug 13, 12:46 2
      - [deleted] 1
        
        your ability to circumvent a tried and true stat is amazing. - groiny Aug 13, 12:49

Post a message top

You might want to look at Cahill's numbers again, and Pavano too while you ar at it.

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.