ST Alpha - "I meant the Jets, the team Spawn shouldn't have cut, but I'd never ignore a defense due to one or two opponents. -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 154

In response to "they play NO in the 2nd week, have GB as well...I don't see that as risk free either. -- nm" by Beaker

I meant the Jets, the team Spawn shouldn't have cut, but I'd never ignore a defense due to one or two opponents. -- nm

Posted by David (aka David) Aug 30 '10, 11:38

(No message)

Responses:

In Spawn's defense....heh.....he could have gotten them back; whereas Jennings or Moss never woulda gotten there. -- nm - Will Hunting Aug 30, 11:40 6
- That's the point. WRs are so much more fungible. He may get away with it, but it was a critical mistake. -- nm - David Aug 30, 11:49 1
  - We will see. - Spawn Aug 30, 11:52
- And I did plan on taking them with the 1-12/2-1. When I saw the non-snake, I was annoyed. - Spawn Aug 30, 11:44 3
  - Blood Feud has always been non-snake first to rounds. - the wrong element, bad guy Aug 30, 11:48 2
    - I may nuke that team and start over. - Spawn Aug 30, 11:49 1
      - Same as Blood Feud. - the wrong element, bad guy Aug 30, 11:59

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.