ST Alpha - "That we're going the Roe v. Wade route on this one? -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 155

That we're going the Roe v. Wade route on this one? -- nm

Posted by Ender (aka Ender) Sep 10 '10, 09:59

(No message)

Responses:

either way, the river has to be crossed -- nm - crash davis Sep 10, 10:01
be nice if we didn't have to. -- nm - ty97 Sep 10, 10:00
[deleted] 12
- Achieving a goal by judicial fiat rather than by a popular groundswell of support, leading to 40 years of fighting over the issue. - Ender Sep 10, 10:04 10
  - Also, in your scenario, what are the courts supposed to do while these unconstitutional laws are being passed? - con_carne Sep 10, 10:50 2
    - [deleted] 1
      - It's not like anyone *likes* seeing laws passed and then struck down. It results in an inefficiency that benefits few. -- nm - con_carne Sep 10, 10:54
  - Minorities are just that because the public at large thinks there are better things to do than look out for their interest. - con_carne Sep 10, 10:37
  - Your IM is really easy for you to prefer as a hetero. - ty97 Sep 10, 10:11
  - This will basically always happen. Minority rights are never a priority for the majority. -- nm - Reagen Sep 10, 10:09 2
    - [deleted] 1
      - Only til November. And then it's Linc Chafee time! -- nm - TFox Sep 10, 10:14
  - [deleted]
  - but not all SC decisions remain controversial for that long, i.e. Brown V Board of Education -- nm - crash davis Sep 10, 10:06
- coat hangers and back alleys. -- nm - Don Homer Sep 10, 10:03

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.