Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 3, 14:19
2: Dec 3, 11:17
3: Dec 3, 07:33
4: Dec 2, 17:22
5: Dec 2, 11:48
6: Dec 2, 08:21
7: Dec 1, 17:33
8: Dec 1, 11:23
9: Nov 30, 15:54
10: Nov 30, 09:41
11: Nov 29, 16:44
12: Nov 29, 08:01
13: Nov 28, 16:19
14: Nov 28, 09:42
15: Nov 27, 18:07
16: Nov 27, 12:04
17: Nov 27, 08:26
18: Nov 26, 18:06
19: Nov 26, 12:05
20: Nov 26, 08:29
Posts: 155
In response to
"
The practical difference is that if the GOP controls Congress they can't be the party of "no"
"
by
TWuG
Right. Say a GOP Congress tries to pass immigration laws that don't go far enough for the tea party. Do those members block it? -- nm
Posted by
Dano (aka dano)
Sep 15 '10, 15:10
(No message)
Responses:
IIRC didn't bog standard Republicans do this just a few years ago? -- nm
-
Roger More
Sep 15, 15:39
in that specific hypo, i would think there could be enough Blue Dog Dems to offset any far-right votes they would lose
-
bugsy
Sep 15, 15:15
It gets passed. IF it gets to a vote. They'll control committees and it'll take just one Teabagger to hold
-
TWuG
Sep 15, 15:13
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.